Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/In re Constitutionality of Canon 3, Rule 3.11 of the Code of Judicial Conduct

In re Constitutionality of Canon 3, Rule 3.11 of the Code of Judicial Conduct

111 A.3d 167, 631 Pa. 289, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 462
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 2, 2015
DocketNo. 23 MM 2015
StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.3d 167 (In re Constitutionality of Canon 3, Rule 3.11 of the Code of Judicial Conduct) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Constitutionality of Canon 3, Rule 3.11 of the Code of Judicial Conduct, 111 A.3d 167, 631 Pa. 289, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 462 (Pa. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Supplemental Application for Extraordinary Relief is GRANTED, and the Application for Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 A.3d 167, 631 Pa. 289, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-constitutionality-of-canon-3-rule-311-of-the-code-of-judicial-pa-2015.