In re Constantino
This text of 686 So. 2d 847 (In re Constantino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Suspension Ordered.
Considering the foregoing Joint Petition for Interim Suspension:
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that respondent, GLENN M. CONSTANTINO, JR., attorney at law, be and he is placed on interim suspension from the practice of law, said suspension to be effective January 31, 1997, and remaining in effect until further orders of this court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that from the date of filing of the petition until the effective date of the interim suspension, January 31, 1997, respondent shall not undertake the representation of new clients and shall comply fully with Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 26.
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel is directed to institute disciplinary proceedings pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 11.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
686 So. 2d 847, 1997 La. LEXIS 213, 1997 WL 31768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-constantino-la-1997.