In re Constantine

632 A.2d 305, 534 Pa. 269, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 216
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 5, 1993
DocketNo. 945 Disciplinary Docket No. 2; Board File No. C1-93-364
StatusPublished

This text of 632 A.2d 305 (In re Constantine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Constantine, 632 A.2d 305, 534 Pa. 269, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 216 (Pa. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 1993, Andrew Constantine, II, having been suspended from the practice of law in the [270]*270State of New Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated March 23, 1993; the said Andrew Constantine, II, having been directed on July 15, 1993, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the response filed, it is

ORDERED that Andrew Constantine, II, is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
632 A.2d 305, 534 Pa. 269, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-constantine-pa-1993.