In re Consolidated Textile Corp.

S.D. New York

In re Consolidated Textile Corp.

89 F. Supp. 315, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1852

DecidedApril 27, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 89 F. Supp. 315 (In re Consolidated Textile Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Consolidated Textile Corp., 89 F. Supp. 315, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1852 (S.D.N.Y. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

GODDARD, District Judge.

The motion to reopen the reorganized estate so as to permit the petitioner to exchange her bonds after the bar date must be denied. Duebler v. Sherneth Corp., 2 Cir., 160 F.2d 472; North American Car Corp. v. Peerless Weighing & Vending Mach. Corp., 2 Cir., 143 F.2d 938.

[316]*316The amendment to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., does not avail the petitioner. See Grand Union Equipment Co. v. Lippner, 2 Cir., 167 F.2d 958.

Motion denied.

Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI