In re Consolidated Textile Corp.
89 F. Supp. 315, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1852
Opinion
The motion to reopen the reorganized estate so as to permit the petitioner to exchange her bonds after the bar date must be denied. Duebler v. Sherneth Corp., 2 Cir., 160 F.2d 472; North American Car Corp. v. Peerless Weighing & Vending Mach. Corp., 2 Cir., 143 F.2d 938.
[316]*316The amendment to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., does not avail the petitioner. See Grand Union Equipment Co. v. Lippner, 2 Cir., 167 F.2d 958.
Motion denied.
Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Consolidated Textile Corp., 89 F. Supp. 315, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1852 (S.D.N.Y. 1949).
89 F. Supp. 315 (In re Consolidated Textile Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
North American Car Corp. v. Peerless Weighing & Vending MacHine Corp.
143 F.2d 938 (Second Circuit, 1944)
Grand Union Equipment Co. v. Lippner
167 F.2d 958 (Second Circuit, 1948)
Duebler v. Sherneth Corp.
160 F.2d 472 (Second Circuit, 1947)