In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction Cases

781 N.E.2d 220, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1401
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 6, 2003
Docket2001-1912
StatusPublished

This text of 781 N.E.2d 220 (In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction Cases) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction Cases, 781 N.E.2d 220, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1401 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-010137. Reported at 97 Ohio St.3d 465, 2002-Ohio-6720, 780 N.E.2d 556. On motions for reconsideration of First Union Home Equity Bank, N.A., Beneficial Ohio, Inc. et al., Huntington National Bank, The Provident Bank, Union Savings Bank, Guardian Savings Bank, Nationsbanc Mortgage Corporation, and Capstead, Inc. Motions denied.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent. Douglas, J., participated in the decision of this motion before his retirement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction Cases
2002 Ohio 6720 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
781 N.E.2d 220, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-consol-mtge-satisfaction-cases-ohio-2003.