In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction Cases

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction Cases

781 N.E.2d 220, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1401

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction Cases. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 Ohio St. 3d 465 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 6, 2003·No. 2001-1912·Published

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-010137. Reported at 97 Ohio St.3d 465, 2002-Ohio-6720, 780 N.E.2d 556. On motions for reconsideration of First Union Home Equity Bank, N.A., Beneficial Ohio, Inc. et al., Huntington National Bank, The Provident Bank, Union Savings Bank, Guardian Savings Bank, Nationsbanc Mortgage Corporation, and Capstead, Inc. Motions denied.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent. Douglas, J., participated in the decision of this motion before his retirement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-010137. Reported at 97 Ohio St.3d 465, 2002-Ohio-6720, 780 N.E.2d 556. On motions for reconsideration of First Union Home Equity Bank, N.A., Beneficial Ohio, Inc. et al., Huntington National Bank, The Provident Bank, Union Savings Bank, Guardian Savings Bank, Nationsbanc Mortgage Corporation, and Capstead, Inc. Motions denied.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent. Douglas, J., participated in the decision of this motion before his retirement.

In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction Cases, 781 N.E.2d 220, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1401 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

781 N.E.2d 220 (In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction Cases) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.