In re Conrad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Conrad

100 A.D.2d 561, 473 N.Y.S.2d 343, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17534

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 1984·Published

Opinion

Motion by petitioner, a disbarred attorney, for reinstatement to the Bar. By order of this court petitioner was ordered to be reinstated forthwith upon his submission of proof of satisfactory completion of a New York State Bar Review course. 1 This court has received satisfactory proof that petitioner, Leo Conrad, has completed a bar review course and therefore he is reinstated as a member of the Bar of the State of New York forthwith; and the clerk of this court is directed to restore his name to the roll of attorneys immediately. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by petitioner, a disbarred attorney, for reinstatement to the Bar. By order of this court petitioner was ordered to be reinstated forthwith upon his submission of proof of satisfactory completion of a New York State Bar Review course. 1 This court has received satisfactory proof that petitioner, Leo Conrad, has completed a bar review course and therefore he is reinstated as a member of the Bar of the State of New York forthwith; and the clerk of this court is directed to restore his name to the roll of attorneys immediately. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and Fiber, JJ., concur.

In re Conrad, 100 A.D.2d 561, 473 N.Y.S.2d 343, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17534 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

100 A.D.2d 561 (In re Conrad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.