In re Conner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Conner

935 A.2d 758, 193 N.J. 25, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 1254

DecidedOctober 31, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 935 A.2d 758 (In re Conner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Conner, 935 A.2d 758, 193 N.J. 25, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 1254 (N.J. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-120, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 14(a)(4)(E), JOHN KELVIN CONNER of JENKINTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be reprimanded based on discipline imposed in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that in New Jersey violates RPC 1.15(a)(negligent misappropriation of client funds), RPC 1.15(b)(failure to promptly deliver funds to client), and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;

[26]*26It is ORDERED that JOHN KELVIN CONNER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-120, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 14(a)(4)(E), JOHN KELVIN CONNER of JENKINTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be reprimanded based on discipline imposed in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that in New Jersey violates RPC 1.15(a)(negligent misappropriation of client funds), RPC 1.15(b)(failure to promptly deliver funds to client), and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;

[26]*26It is ORDERED that JOHN KELVIN CONNER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

935 A.2d 758, 193 N.J. 25, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 1254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-conner-nj-2007.