Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Conklin

In re Conklin

235 A.D. 740
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 740 (In re Conklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Conklin, 235 A.D. 740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The question to be certified is: Upon the record [741]*741presented, are the children of William H. Tuttle and Sarah Osborne eonext of Mn with the respondents, the brothers of said William H. Tuttle, and should prayer of the petition herein have been granted? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-conklin-nyappdiv-1932.