Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Conine

In re Conine

253 A.D.2d 999, 678 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9970
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 25, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 253 A.D.2d 999 (In re Conine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Conine, 253 A.D.2d 999, 678 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9970 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was suspended from practice for a period of two years, effective April 1992 (Matter of Conine, 182 AD2d 913). He now applies for reinstatement to practice. Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, opposes the application.

Because we conclude that respondent has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]), we deny the application for reinstatement.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application for reinstatement is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Schechterman
268 A.D.2d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.D.2d 999, 678 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-conine-nyappdiv-1998.