In re Confidential Party

221 So. 3d 39, 2017 WL 2436673, 2017 La. LEXIS 1233
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 5, 2017
DocketNO. 2017-B-0711
StatusPublished

This text of 221 So. 3d 39 (In re Confidential Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Confidential Party, 221 So. 3d 39, 2017 WL 2436673, 2017 La. LEXIS 1233 (La. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

| t Considering the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline, filed by respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline be and hereby is rejected pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for, .expedited consideration of - the previously filed formal charges.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Marcus Clark JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 So. 3d 39, 2017 WL 2436673, 2017 La. LEXIS 1233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-confidential-party-la-2017.