Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/In re Confidential Party

In re Confidential Party

184 So. 3d 1270, 2016 La. LEXIS 359, 2016 WL 783066
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 26, 2016·No. No. 2015-B-2319·Published

Opinions

ORDER

[ Considering the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline be and hereby is rejected pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20. '

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for consideration of the previously filed formal charges.

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this 26th day of February, 2016.

[1271] FOR THE-COURT:

/s/ John L. Weimer /s/ Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

KNOLL, J., would conditionally reject ■ the consént discipline. CLARK, J., would conditionally reject the consent discipline.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Confidential Party, 184 So. 3d 1270, 2016 La. LEXIS 359, 2016 WL 783066 (La. 2016).

184 So. 3d 1270 (In re Confidential Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.