In re Confidential Party

993 So. 2d 217, 2008 La. LEXIS 2411, 2008 WL 4757023

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 30, 2008·No. No. 2008-B-2347·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Considering the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline be and hereby is rejected pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for consideration of the previously filed formal charges.

/s/ Pascal F. Calogero, Jr. Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Considering the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline be and hereby is rejected pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for consideration of the previously filed formal charges.

/s/ Pascal F. Calogero, Jr. Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Confidential Party, 993 So. 2d 217, 2008 La. LEXIS 2411, 2008 WL 4757023 (La. 2008).

Pincite

993 So. 2d 217 (In re Confidential Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.