Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/In re Confidential Party

In re Confidential Party

870 So. 2d 259, 2004 La. LEXIS 970, 2004 WL 615126
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Confidential Party. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 La. LEXIS 2222 →
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 26, 2004·No. No. 2004-B-0275·Published

Opinion

In re Confidential Party; Disciplinary Counsel; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Joint Petition for Consent Discipline.

ORDER

Considering the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline be and hereby is rejected pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for consideration of the previously filed formal charges.

KIMBALL and TRAYLOR, JJ., would accept the consent discipline.

/s/ Pascal F. Calogero, Jr. Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Confidential Party, 870 So. 2d 259, 2004 La. LEXIS 970, 2004 WL 615126 (La. 2004).

870 So. 2d 259 (In re Confidential Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.