In re Confidential Party C.D.J.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Confidential Party C.D.J.

608 So. 2d 159, 1992 La. LEXIS 3464

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 13, 1992

DocketNo. 92-B-2521

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 608 So. 2d 159 (In re Confidential Party C.D.J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Confidential Party C.D.J., 608 So. 2d 159, 1992 La. LEXIS 3464 (La. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

[160]*160DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the proposal for consent discipline, Disciplinary Counsel’s concurrence, and the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board, the Court adopts the Disciplinary Board’s recommendations.

Accordingly, it is ordered that Charles D. Jones be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day commencing January 1, 1993, but with six months and one day of said suspension to be deferred and suspended, and the remaining six months to be implemented with the further requirement that the respondent be placed on probation for a period of two years, subject to the conditions and requirements set forth in the probation agreement and the Board’s recommendation. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to respondent.

SUSPENSION ORDERED.

DENNIS, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[160]*160DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the proposal for consent discipline, Disciplinary Counsel’s concurrence, and the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board, the Court adopts the Disciplinary Board’s recommendations.

Accordingly, it is ordered that Charles D. Jones be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day commencing January 1, 1993, but with six months and one day of said suspension to be deferred and suspended, and the remaining six months to be implemented with the further requirement that the respondent be placed on probation for a period of two years, subject to the conditions and requirements set forth in the probation agreement and the Board’s recommendation. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to respondent.

SUSPENSION ORDERED.

DENNIS, J., recused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

608 So. 2d 159, 1992 La. LEXIS 3464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-confidential-party-cdj-la-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack