In re Confidential (DLR) Per Curiam

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Confidential (DLR) Per Curiam

163 A.3d 115

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 13, 2017

Docket17-BS-283

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.3d 115 (In re Confidential (DLR) Per Curiam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Confidential (DLR) Per Curiam, 163 A.3d 115 (D.C. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Upon consideration of the petition of. the Board on Professional Responsibility’s (the “Board”) pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c), to suspend respondent indefinitely based on disability, and the Board’s motion to file under seal, and it appearing that neither respondent nor Disciplinary Counsel has interposed any objection thereto, it is hereby .

ORDERED that the Board’s motion to file under seal is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is indefinitely suspended from.the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately, and any pending matters be held in abeyance pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI § 13(g). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is drawn to requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, §§ 14 and 16, relating to suspended attorneys. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) with the Court and the Board and shall serve a copy of the affidavit on Disciplinary Counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI