In re Condurso

97 A.3d 260, 219 N.J. 122, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 878
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedAugust 27, 2014
StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.3d 260 (In re Condurso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Condurso, 97 A.3d 260, 219 N.J. 122, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 878 (N.J. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

ROBERT JAMES CONDURSO, JR., formerly of MANAS-QUAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1998, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since December 4, 2013, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT JAMES CONDURSO, JR., is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A.3d 260, 219 N.J. 122, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-condurso-nj-2014.