In Re Condemnation of Lands for a New State House

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

In Re Condemnation of Lands for a New State House

41 A. 1004, 21 R.I. 59, 1898 R.I. LEXIS 22

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedNovember 12, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 A. 1004 (In Re Condemnation of Lands for a New State House) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Condemnation of Lands for a New State House, 41 A. 1004, 21 R.I. 59, 1898 R.I. LEXIS 22 (R.I. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Matteson, C. J.

(1) Our opinion is that the nonsuit was properly granted. The case shows that at the time of the commencement of the proceedings, in May, 1893, the claimant’s testator, Philip A. Doyle, held a portion -of the land proposed to be taken as a tenant from year to year; that his current occupation year began on July 1, 1892, and expired on July 1, 1893; that the land was condemned July 9, 1893, and that the claimant’s testator continued in the occupation of it undisturbed, not only till the expiration of his occupation year, but for several months after the condemnation. The contention of the claimant is that his testator, being a tenant from year to year and having received from the landlord no notice to terminate the tenancy, was entitled to hold *60 over for another year, and is therefore entitled to damages for so much of the year ensuing July 1, 1893, as he was deprived of the occupation of the land. We do not think that the contention can be sustained. Though as between himself and the landlord the tenant may have acquired the right to hold for another year, by the failure of the landlord to give the requisite notice to terminate the tenancy, such failure gave no right as against the State House Commissioners. The right of the tenant to hold over as against them was obtained after the giving of the notice of condemnation proceedings in May, 1893, and was obtained, therefore, pendente lite, so far as they were concerned, and was subordinate to their rights under the proceedings. Such being the case, and the tenant having been permitted to remain until the expiration of his current occupation year, the claimant is entitled to no compensation, for his testator’s right in the property as against the State House Commissioners ceased with the expiration of the occupation year. Schreiber v. Chicago & Evanston R. R. Co., 115 Ill. 340 (346, 347); Lewis Em. Dom. § 326 and note 4.

Andrew B. Patton, for claimant. Willard B. Tanner, Attorney-General, for the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matteson, C. J.

(1) Our opinion is that the nonsuit was properly granted. The case shows that at the time of the commencement of the proceedings, in May, 1893, the claimant’s testator, Philip A. Doyle, held a portion -of the land proposed to be taken as a tenant from year to year; that his current occupation year began on July 1, 1892, and expired on July 1, 1893; that the land was condemned July 9, 1893, and that the claimant’s testator continued in the occupation of it undisturbed, not only till the expiration of his occupation year, but for several months after the condemnation. The contention of the claimant is that his testator, being a tenant from year to year and having received from the landlord no notice to terminate the tenancy, was entitled to hold *60 over for another year, and is therefore entitled to damages for so much of the year ensuing July 1, 1893, as he was deprived of the occupation of the land. We do not think that the contention can be sustained. Though as between himself and the landlord the tenant may have acquired the right to hold for another year, by the failure of the landlord to give the requisite notice to terminate the tenancy, such failure gave no right as against the State House Commissioners. The right of the tenant to hold over as against them was obtained after the giving of the notice of condemnation proceedings in May, 1893, and was obtained, therefore, pendente lite, so far as they were concerned, and was subordinate to their rights under the proceedings. Such being the case, and the tenant having been permitted to remain until the expiration of his current occupation year, the claimant is entitled to no compensation, for his testator’s right in the property as against the State House Commissioners ceased with the expiration of the occupation year. Schreiber v. Chicago & Evanston R. R. Co., 115 Ill. 340 (346, 347); Lewis Em. Dom. § 326 and note 4.

Andrew B. Patton, for claimant. Willard B. Tanner, Attorney-General, for the State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A. 1004, 21 R.I. 59, 1898 R.I. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-condemnation-of-lands-for-a-new-state-house-ri-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack