In re Condemnation of 39 East Gay Street

456 A.2d 1173, 72 Pa. Commw. 589, 1983 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1433
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 15, 1983·No. Appeal, No. 1007 C.D. 1980·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Flora H. Friedman, Henry Friedman, Ethel H. Ball and Harry N. Ball (appellants) appeal here from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County which overruled their preliminary objections to an amended declaration of taking filed by the Redevelopment Authority of the County of Chester.

After a careful review of the record, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and did not commit an error of law.1

We will, therefore, affirm on the basis of the able opinion of Judge Leonard Sugerman, which will be found at Pa. D. & C.3d (1982).

[591] Order

And Now, this 15th day of March, 1983, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County in the above-captioned matter, is hereby affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Condemnation of 39 East Gay Street, 456 A.2d 1173, 72 Pa. Commw. 589, 1983 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1433 (Pa. Ct. App. 1983).

456 A.2d 1173 (In re Condemnation of 39 East Gay Street) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pidstawski v. South Whitehall Township
380 A.2d 1322 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)