In re Condemnation by Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh of Certain Land in the Twenty-Second & Twenty-Third Wards

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Condemnation by Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh of Certain Land in the Twenty-Second & Twenty-Third Wards

558 A.2d 529, 521 Pa. 539, 1989 Pa. LEXIS 538

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 15, 1989

DocketPetition No. 433 W.D. Allocatur Docket 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 558 A.2d 529 (In re Condemnation by Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh of Certain Land in the Twenty-Second & Twenty-Third Wards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Condemnation by Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh of Certain Land in the Twenty-Second & Twenty-Third Wards, 558 A.2d 529, 521 Pa. 539, 1989 Pa. LEXIS 538 (Pa. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 1989, it is hereby ordered that the Petition for Allowance of Appeal be and is hereby granted; it is further ordered that the issues on [540]*540appeal be limited to the first two issues raised in Petitioners’ Petition for Allowance of Appeal, viz., whether the condemnees have been unconstitutionally denied a meaningful hearing at a meaningful time to challenge the certification of blight which has affected their property and their property rights and exposed them to a condemnation proceeding, and whether the taking is invalid for the failure of the certification of blight process to comply with the requirements of the Local Agency Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 1989, it is hereby ordered that the Petition for Allowance of Appeal be and is hereby granted; it is further ordered that the issues on [540]*540appeal be limited to the first two issues raised in Petitioners’ Petition for Allowance of Appeal, viz., whether the condemnees have been unconstitutionally denied a meaningful hearing at a meaningful time to challenge the certification of blight which has affected their property and their property rights and exposed them to a condemnation proceeding, and whether the taking is invalid for the failure of the certification of blight process to comply with the requirements of the Local Agency Law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

558 A.2d 529, 521 Pa. 539, 1989 Pa. LEXIS 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-condemnation-by-urban-redevelopment-authority-of-pittsburgh-of-pa-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack