In re Condemnation by Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh of Certain Land in the Twenty-Second & Twenty-Third Wards

558 A.2d 529, 521 Pa. 539, 1989 Pa. LEXIS 538
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 15, 1989·No. Petition No. 433 W.D. Allocatur Docket 1988·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 1989, it is hereby ordered that the Petition for Allowance of Appeal be and is hereby granted; it is further ordered that the issues on [540]*540appeal be limited to the first two issues raised in Petitioners’ Petition for Allowance of Appeal, viz., whether the condemnees have been unconstitutionally denied a meaningful hearing at a meaningful time to challenge the certification of blight which has affected their property and their property rights and exposed them to a condemnation proceeding, and whether the taking is invalid for the failure of the certification of blight process to comply with the requirements of the Local Agency Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Condemnation by Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh of Certain Land in the Twenty-Second & Twenty-Third Wards, 558 A.2d 529, 521 Pa. 539, 1989 Pa. LEXIS 538 (Pa. 1989).

558 A.2d 529 (In re Condemnation by Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh of Certain Land in the Twenty-Second & Twenty-Third Wards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wildman v. Homa
32 Pa. D. & C.4th 468 (Washington County Court of Common Pleas, 1996)