In re Condemnation by the City of Greensboro of Certain Land & Improvements

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In re Condemnation by the City of Greensboro of Certain Land & Improvements

108 S.E.2d 672, 250 N.C. 373, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 671

DecidedMay 20, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 108 S.E.2d 672 (In re Condemnation by the City of Greensboro of Certain Land & Improvements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Condemnation by the City of Greensboro of Certain Land & Improvements, 108 S.E.2d 672, 250 N.C. 373, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 671 (N.C. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER Cueiam.

The sole question for the jury to determine in the eourt below was simply this: What wias the fair market mlue of the land, and the improvements thereon, which the City of Greensboro condemned for municipal purposes, as of 5 May' 1958?

The petitioner and the respondents offered numerous witnesses who testified as to the fair market value of the 10.692 acres of land, involved in this condemnation proceeding, as of 5 May 1958. The appellants have brought forward 27 assignments of error, based on 99 exceptions, most of ‘them being directed to the admission or exclusion of evidence. However, after a careful examination of these assignments of error and the exceptions upon which they are based, we are constrained to hold that no prejudicial error of sufficient magnitude to justify a new trial is made to appear.

In the trial below there is in law

No Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER Cueiam.

The sole question for the jury to determine in the eourt below was simply this: What wias the fair market mlue of the land, and the improvements thereon, which the City of Greensboro condemned for municipal purposes, as of 5 May' 1958?

The petitioner and the respondents offered numerous witnesses who testified as to the fair market value of the 10.692 acres of land, involved in this condemnation proceeding, as of 5 May 1958. The appellants have brought forward 27 assignments of error, based on 99 exceptions, most of ‘them being directed to the admission or exclusion of evidence. However, after a careful examination of these assignments of error and the exceptions upon which they are based, we are constrained to hold that no prejudicial error of sufficient magnitude to justify a new trial is made to appear.

In the trial below there is in law

No Error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 S.E.2d 672, 250 N.C. 373, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-condemnation-by-the-city-of-greensboro-of-certain-land-improvements-nc-1959.