In re Complaint Concerning Todd

359 N.W.2d 266
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedNovember 28, 1984
DocketNo. C9-83-1744
StatusPublished

This text of 359 N.W.2d 266 (In re Complaint Concerning Todd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Complaint Concerning Todd, 359 N.W.2d 266 (Mich. 1984).

Opinion

ORDER

Based on the file, record and proceedings herein and pursuant to our order dated November 1, 1984, released November 14, 1984, IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED:

1. A panel of referees is hereby appointed and shall consist of the following individuals:

(1) Nicholas S. Chanak, District Judge, retired, to serve as presiding referee.
(2) Esther M. Tomljanovich, District Judge, Tenth Judicial District.
(3) Bertrand Poritsky, District Judge, Second Judicial District.

2. The panel shall contact the parties to arrange a formal hearing on the complaint dated October 28, 1983.

3. The panel shall submit its findings and recommendations to the undersigned, serving as Acting Justices of the Minnesota Supreme Court.1

4. The State Court Administrator shall make all necessary arrangements and expend such appropriate funds as requested by the panel of referees.

IN BEHALF OF THE COURT OF APPEALS

(Acting as Justices of the Supreme Court)

PETER S. POPOVICH, Chief Judge DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge D.D. WOZNIAK, Judge SUSANNE C. SEDGWICK, Judge HARRIET LANSING, Judge (Judge Edward J. Parker taking no part.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 2.724
Minnesota § 2.724

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
359 N.W.2d 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-complaint-concerning-todd-minn-1984.