In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Scott
464 P.2d 318, 255 Or. 77, 1970 Ore. LEXIS 374
Opinion
This proceeding involves petitioner’s use of her notary public commission to acknowledge the execu *78 tion of a document when the person who signed the document did not appear before her when the document was executed. Mrs. Scott candidly admits that she did so. Even though the evidence is convincing that she was innocent of any ulterior motives or purposes, this is conduct that cannot go unnoticed. In re Monte E. Walter, 1967, 247 Or 13, 427 P2d 96. This is, therefore, a reprimand.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Scott, 464 P.2d 318, 255 Or. 77, 1970 Ore. LEXIS 374 (Or. 1970).
464 P.2d 318 (In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Morrow
688 P.2d 820 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1984)
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Smith
636 P.2d 923 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1981)
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Kraus
616 P.2d 1173 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1980)
In Re Sims
584 P.2d 766 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1978)
Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
474 P.2d 316 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1970)