In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Roberts
This text of 71 P.3d 71 (In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) alleged that, in the course of representing the conservator of the estate of a protected person, the accused violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(4) (conduct prejudicial to administration of justice) and DR 6-101(A) (incompetent representation). The trial panel concluded that the accused had violated those rules and that the appropriate sanction was a 60-day suspension from the practice of law. The accused sought review under Bar Rule of Procedure (BR) 10.3.
We review de novo. ORS 9.536(3); BR 10.6. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the accused knowingly violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and negligently violated DR 6-101(A). An explanation of the facts of this proceeding or our application of the law to those facts would not benefit the bench, the Bar, or the public. We further conclude that a 60-day suspension is the appropriate sanction.
The accused is suspended from the practice of law for a period of 60 days, commencing 60 days from the filing of this decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 P.3d 71, 335 Or. 476, 2003 Ore. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-complaint-as-to-the-conduct-of-roberts-or-2003.