In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lamkin

Oregon Supreme Court

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lamkin

299 P.2d 1076, 208 Or. 165, 1956 Ore. LEXIS 211

DecidedJuly 31, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 299 P.2d 1076 (In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lamkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lamkin, 299 P.2d 1076, 208 Or. 165, 1956 Ore. LEXIS 211 (Or. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Walter S. Lamldn, an attorney duly licensed to practice in the courts of the state of Oregon, is accused of professional misconduct. A trial was had before the trial committee of the Oregon State Bar which resulted in a finding of professional misconduct and a recommendation to the Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar that Walter S. Lamkin be permanently disbarred.

The Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar adopted the recommendation of the trial committee, and recommends to this court that the recommendation of the trial committee be adopted.

[166]*166We have reviewed the record in this canse and agree fully with the recommendation of the Board of Governors.

The defendant is, therefore, permanently disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Walter S. Lamldn, an attorney duly licensed to practice in the courts of the state of Oregon, is accused of professional misconduct. A trial was had before the trial committee of the Oregon State Bar which resulted in a finding of professional misconduct and a recommendation to the Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar that Walter S. Lamkin be permanently disbarred.

The Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar adopted the recommendation of the trial committee, and recommends to this court that the recommendation of the trial committee be adopted.

[166]*166We have reviewed the record in this canse and agree fully with the recommendation of the Board of Governors.

The defendant is, therefore, permanently disbarred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 P.2d 1076, 208 Or. 165, 1956 Ore. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-complaint-as-to-the-conduct-of-lamkin-or-1956.