In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Kraus

Oregon Supreme Court

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Kraus

395 P.2d 446, 238 Or. 482, 1964 Ore. LEXIS 462

Oregon Supreme Court·Decided September 23, 1964·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This man was charged by the Oregon State Bar with several acts of professional misconduct. He failed to answer the complaint and never appeared at the hearing held. The trial committee found him guilty of some of the charges 'and recommended a penalty of a one year suspension from the practice of law. A majority of the Board of Governors could not agree on a penalty. We are of the opinion that the offenses war[483] rant a suspension for a period of three years and until he he reinstated as required by the rules of this court. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This man was charged by the Oregon State Bar with several acts of professional misconduct. He failed to answer the complaint and never appeared at the hearing held. The trial committee found him guilty of some of the charges 'and recommended a penalty of a one year suspension from the practice of law. A majority of the Board of Governors could not agree on a penalty. We are of the opinion that the offenses war[483] rant a suspension for a period of three years and until he he reinstated as required by the rules of this court. It is so ordered.

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Kraus, 395 P.2d 446, 238 Or. 482, 1964 Ore. LEXIS 462 (Or. 1964).

Pincite

395 P.2d 446 (In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Kraus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related