In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Dobson

Oregon Supreme Court

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Dobson

377 P.2d 160, 233 Or. 176, 1962 Ore. LEXIS 485

DecidedDecember 31, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 377 P.2d 160 (In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Dobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Dobson, 377 P.2d 160, 233 Or. 176, 1962 Ore. LEXIS 485 (Or. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The accused, Cecil William Dobson, was convicted of a felony August 13,19G2. His license was suspended pursuant to Rule I, September 5, 19G2. Thereafter, pursuant to the rules of procedure of this court and the Oregon State Bar, trial of the accused was had.

The trial court found the accused guilty of professional misconduct in that he had committed the crime of larceny by embezzlement.

The Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar made findings of fact and has recommended permanent disbarment. The findings of fact and recommendations of the Board of Governors are approved and the accused is permanently disbarred.

[177]*177It is also adjudged and decreed the Oregon State Bar shall have judgment for its costs and disbursements herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The accused, Cecil William Dobson, was convicted of a felony August 13,19G2. His license was suspended pursuant to Rule I, September 5, 19G2. Thereafter, pursuant to the rules of procedure of this court and the Oregon State Bar, trial of the accused was had.

The trial court found the accused guilty of professional misconduct in that he had committed the crime of larceny by embezzlement.

The Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar made findings of fact and has recommended permanent disbarment. The findings of fact and recommendations of the Board of Governors are approved and the accused is permanently disbarred.

[177]*177It is also adjudged and decreed the Oregon State Bar shall have judgment for its costs and disbursements herein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

377 P.2d 160, 233 Or. 176, 1962 Ore. LEXIS 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-complaint-as-to-the-conduct-of-dobson-or-1962.