In re Complaint Against Stramese

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Complaint Against Stramese

158 A. 342, 10 N.J. Misc. 137, 1932 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 309

DecidedJanuary 21, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 158 A. 342 (In re Complaint Against Stramese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Complaint Against Stramese, 158 A. 342, 10 N.J. Misc. 137, 1932 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 309 (N.J. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cttbiam.

The board of bar examiners found the accused guilty of unethical conduct charged, and recommended that he be suspended from practice as an attorney-at-law for a period of one year. A motion was made to confirm this report.

Our examination of the report and record satisfies us that the report is just and right. Our order, therefore, is that the report be confirmed and that the accused, Gilio Stramese, be suspended from practice as an attorney-at-law for a period of one year, beginning on the twenty-first day of January, 1932.

Incidentally it appears that pending the investigation by the board of bar examiners resulting in the foregoing report now confirmed the accused, Gilio Stramese, passed his examination as counselor-at-law. In view of his suspension as above stated, the order of the court is that he shall not be sworn in as counselor-at-law until the above stated period of suspension has expired.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cttbiam.

The board of bar examiners found the accused guilty of unethical conduct charged, and recommended that he be suspended from practice as an attorney-at-law for a period of one year. A motion was made to confirm this report.

Our examination of the report and record satisfies us that the report is just and right. Our order, therefore, is that the report be confirmed and that the accused, Gilio Stramese, be suspended from practice as an attorney-at-law for a period of one year, beginning on the twenty-first day of January, 1932.

Incidentally it appears that pending the investigation by the board of bar examiners resulting in the foregoing report now confirmed the accused, Gilio Stramese, passed his examination as counselor-at-law. In view of his suspension as above stated, the order of the court is that he shall not be sworn in as counselor-at-law until the above stated period of suspension has expired.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 A. 342, 10 N.J. Misc. 137, 1932 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-complaint-against-stramese-nj-1932.