In re Complaint Against Nardiello

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Complaint Against Nardiello

144 A. 922, 7 N.J. Misc. 139, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 412

DecidedJanuary 16, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 144 A. 922 (In re Complaint Against Nardiello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Complaint Against Nardiello, 144 A. 922, 7 N.J. Misc. 139, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 412 (N.J. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Peb Cubiam.

The petitioner was disbarred by the Supreme Court by rule entered January 17th, 1928. This application for a rehearing we think must be denied, for the reason, among others, that relief of the applicant should be obtained, if at all, by the procedure outlined in In re Meyer, 127 Atl Rep. 698, and In re Harris, 88 N. J. L. 18.

The petition will be denied, but without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to take the course indicated in the cited cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peb Cubiam.

The petitioner was disbarred by the Supreme Court by rule entered January 17th, 1928. This application for a rehearing we think must be denied, for the reason, among others, that relief of the applicant should be obtained, if at all, by the procedure outlined in In re Meyer, 127 Atl Rep. 698, and In re Harris, 88 N. J. L. 18.

The petition will be denied, but without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to take the course indicated in the cited cases.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 A. 922, 7 N.J. Misc. 139, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-complaint-against-nardiello-nj-1929.