in Re Commitment of Alonzo May
This text of in Re Commitment of Alonzo May (in Re Commitment of Alonzo May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-17-00214-CV ____________________
IN RE COMMITMENT OF ALONZO MAY
_______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 12-12-13065-CV ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In 2013, Alonzo May was committed for sex offender treatment as a sexually
violent predator. See generally In re Commitment of May, No. 09-13-00513-CV,
2014 WL 6984086, at *3 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Dec. 11, 2014, pet. denied) (mem.
op.) (affirming judgment and order of commitment). On June 7, 2017, May filed a
pro se notice of appeal from an order signed on April 25, 2017, that placed May in
a tiered treatment program for sexually violent predators. See generally Tex. Health
1 & Safety Code Ann. § 841.0831 (West 2017). We questioned our jurisdiction over
this appeal and May filed a response.1
Generally, the trial court retains jurisdiction while the commitment order
remains in effect and we lack appellate jurisdiction when the trial court modifies a
commitment order without ending the court’s supervision of the committed person
and without making the otherwise interlocutory order appealable. In re Commitment
of Cortez, 405 S.W.3d 929, 931 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2013, no pet.). May has not
identified a signed order by the trial court that is appealable at this time. Accordingly,
the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice Submitted on July 19, 2017 Opinion Delivered July 20, 2017
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
1 May complains that State Counsel for Offenders has not entered an appearance on his behalf. The statutory right to counsel under Chapter 841 of the Texas Health and Safety Code applies to a trial or hearing conducted under Subchapters D, F, or G. See In re Terry, No. 09-16-00208-CV, 2016 WL 4698648, at *1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Sept. 8, 2016, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). May is attempting to appeal an order entered under Subchapter E. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Commitment of Alonzo May, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-commitment-of-alonzo-may-texapp-2017.