In re Commissioner of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Commissioner of Social Services

239 A.D.2d 417, 658 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5046

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 239 A.D.2d 417 (In re Commissioner of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Commissioner of Social Services, 239 A.D.2d 417, 658 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In a neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated September 13, 1994, which, inter alia, suspended visitation between the mother and Shoshana L. pending conclusion of the dispositional hearing, and (2) an order of disposition of the same court (Hepner, J.), dated January 17, 1995, extending the placement of Shoshana L. and the supervision of Chulda L. and Shifra L. for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The orders that are the subject of these appeals have been superseded by subsequent dispositional orders from which no appeals have been taken. Accordingly, the appeals must be dismissed as academic (see, Matter of Keith C, 226 AD2d 369; Matter of Ana P., 215 AD2d 485; Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Servs. [Kalisha A.] v Diognes T., 208 AD2d 844). O’Brien, J. P., Copertino, Thompson and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated September 13, 1994, which, inter alia, suspended visitation between the mother and Shoshana L. pending conclusion of the dispositional hearing, and (2) an order of disposition of the same court (Hepner, J.), dated January 17, 1995, extending the placement of Shoshana L. and the supervision of Chulda L. and Shifra L. for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The orders that are the subject of these appeals have been superseded by subsequent dispositional orders from which no appeals have been taken. Accordingly, the appeals must be dismissed as academic (see, Matter of Keith C, 226 AD2d 369; Matter of Ana P., 215 AD2d 485; Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Servs. [Kalisha A.] v Diognes T., 208 AD2d 844). O’Brien, J. P., Copertino, Thompson and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D.2d 417, 658 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-commissioner-of-social-services-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack