in Re Comfort Roberts
This text of in Re Comfort Roberts (in Re Comfort Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILE COPY
In re Comfort RobertsAppellant/s
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 27, 2014
No. 04-14-00055-CV
IN RE Comfort ROBERTS
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
On January 22, 2014, relator Comfort Roberts filed a petition for writ of mandamus followed by an emergency motion for temporary stay the following day. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary stay are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on January 27th, 2014.
_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of January, 2014.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013CI12260, styled Lloyd Douglas Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a River City Care Center and Steve Robinson v. Comfort Roberts, Joe A. Fuentes, Cynthia Huggins and Ida Jackson, pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Janet Littlejohn presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Comfort Roberts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-comfort-roberts-texapp-2014.