In re Comer

178 L. Ed. 2d 807, 131 S. Ct. 902, 562 U.S. 1133, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 287, 79 U.S.L.W. 3402, 73 ERC (BNA) 1128
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 10, 2011
DocketNo. 10-294
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 178 L. Ed. 2d 807 (In re Comer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Comer, 178 L. Ed. 2d 807, 131 S. Ct. 902, 562 U.S. 1133, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 287, 79 U.S.L.W. 3402, 73 ERC (BNA) 1128 (U.S. 2011).

Opinion

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
718 F.3d 460 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)
Asgeirsson v. Texas Attorney General
696 F.3d 454 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
Comer v. Murphy Oil Usa, Inc.
839 F. Supp. 2d 849 (S.D. Mississippi, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 L. Ed. 2d 807, 131 S. Ct. 902, 562 U.S. 1133, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 287, 79 U.S.L.W. 3402, 73 ERC (BNA) 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-comer-scotus-2011.