In re Colwart
This text of 160 So. 3d 582 (In re Colwart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he engaged in conduct constituting a conflict of interest. Having reviewed the petition,
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that M. Craig Colwart, Louisiana Bar Roll number 4365, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.
Weimer, J., recused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 So. 3d 582, 2015 La. LEXIS 341, 2015 WL 1085894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-colwart-la-2015.