in Re: Columbia Valley Healthcare System, L.P. D/B/A Valley Regional Medical Center

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 6, 2008
Docket13-08-00136-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Columbia Valley Healthcare System, L.P. D/B/A Valley Regional Medical Center (in Re: Columbia Valley Healthcare System, L.P. D/B/A Valley Regional Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Columbia Valley Healthcare System, L.P. D/B/A Valley Regional Medical Center, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-08-136-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI- EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________



IN RE: COLUMBIA VALLEY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P.

D/B/A VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
_____________________________________________________________



On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

_____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Relator, Columbia Valley Healthcare System, L.P. d/b/a Valley Regional Medical Center, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial judge, the Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr., presiding judge of the 107th Judicial District Court of Cameron County, Texas, and/or the presiding judge of the 404th District Court of Cameron County, (1) to vacate his February 7, 2008 order denying relator's Motion to Disqualify and Recuse counsel for real parties-in-interest, Magallanes & Hinojosa, P.C. ("the firm"), in trial court cause number 2006-06-2741-G in the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. The trial court denied the relator's motion to disqualify after a hearing on February 7, 2008.

On April 8, 2008, real parties-in-interest (2) and the firm filed a response. On April 18, 2008, relator filed a Reply Brief in support of its petition for writ of mandamus.

We have reviewed the petition for writ of mandamus, response, reply, and record of the February 7, 2008 hearing. We conclude that the firm established that it took sufficient precautions to guard against any disclosure of confidences by its legal assistant, who was formerly employed by counsel for relator. (3) Accordingly, we conclude that the relator has not shown a clear abuse of discretion or violation of a duty imposed by law.

Relator's petition for writ of mandamus, filed March 13, 2008, is DENIED.



PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 6th day of November, 2008.



1.

Relator notes that although plaintiffs' suit was filed and is currently pending in the 404th District Court of Cameron County, the Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr., judge of the 107th District Court, presided over relator's Motion to Recuse.

2. Real parties-in-interest (plaintiffs below) are Yvonne T. Leal and Alberto B. Leal, Individually and as next friends of Markus T. Leal, a minor.

3. See In re Amer. Home Prod. Corp., 985 S.W.2d 68, 75 (Tex. 1998) (orig. proceeding); Phoenix Founders, Inc. v. Marshall, 887 S.W.2d 831, 835 (Tex. 1994) (orig. proceeding); Grant v. Thirteenth Court of Appeals, 888 S.W.2d 466, 467 (Tex. 1994) (orig. proceeding).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grant v. Thirteenth Court of Appeals
888 S.W.2d 466 (Texas Supreme Court, 1994)
Phoenix Founders, Inc. v. Marshall
887 S.W.2d 831 (Texas Supreme Court, 1994)
In Re American Home Products Corp.
985 S.W.2d 68 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Columbia Valley Healthcare System, L.P. D/B/A Valley Regional Medical Center, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-columbia-valley-healthcare-system-lp-dba-val-texapp-2008.