in Re Colonel Clifton Hoskins, Individually and as Independent of the Estate of Hazel Hoskins
This text of in Re Colonel Clifton Hoskins, Individually and as Independent of the Estate of Hazel Hoskins (in Re Colonel Clifton Hoskins, Individually and as Independent of the Estate of Hazel Hoskins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-18-00296-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE COLONEL CLIFTON HOSKINS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF HAZEL HOSKINS
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria1 Order Per Curiam
The real parties in interest, Marcus P. Rogers, Receiver for the Marital Deduction
Trust and the Residuary Trust created under the Last Will and Testament of Lee Roy
“Cowboy” Hoskins Sr., Lee Roy Hoskins Jr.; Lee Ann Hoskins Kulka; Andrea Clare Jurica;
and Lee Roy “Tito” Hoskins III, have two motions currently pending before this Court: (1)
1 The Honorable Rogelio Valdez, former Chief Justice of this Court, and the Honorable Nelda V.
Rodriguez, former Justice of this Court, did not participate in this decision because their terms of office expired on December 31, 2018. In accordance with the appellate rules, they were replaced on panel by Chief Justice Dori Contreras and Justice Nora Longoria. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.1(a). Unopposed Motion for a Stay of this Court’s Order and Trial Proceedings Pending
Rehearing of Mandamus Petition; and (2) First Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
to File Motion for Rehearing of Mandamus Petition.
The Court, having examined and fully considered these motions, is of the opinion
that they should be granted. Accordingly, we grant the real parties’ Unopposed Motion
for a Stay of this Court’s Order and Trial Proceedings Pending Rehearing of Mandamus
Petition. We stay our order granting mandamus relief and requiring action by the
respondent, and we similarly stay all trial court proceedings, including discovery, pending
further order of this Court or the resolution of the real parties’ motion for rehearing. We
grant the real parties’ First Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for
Rehearing of Mandamus Petition, and such motion will be due on or before February 11,
2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 17th day of January, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Colonel Clifton Hoskins, Individually and as Independent of the Estate of Hazel Hoskins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-colonel-clifton-hoskins-individually-and-as-independent-of-the-texapp-2019.