In Re Colombana

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In Re Colombana

28 A.3d 583, 2011 WL 4084588

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 15, 2011

Docket11-BG-518

StatusPublished

This text of 28 A.3d 583 (In Re Colombana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Colombana, 28 A.3d 583, 2011 WL 4084588 (D.C. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

*584 ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of California disbarring respondent from the practice of law, this court’s May 13, 2011, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Brian J. Colombana is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate, including those involving disbarment). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*584 ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of California disbarring respondent from the practice of law, this court’s May 13, 2011, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Brian J. Colombana is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate, including those involving disbarment). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A.3d 583, 2011 WL 4084588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-colombana-dc-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack