In re Collins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Collins

685 A.2d 1383

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 13, 1996

DocketNo. 254 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 685 A.2d 1383 (In re Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Collins, 685 A.2d 1383 (Pa. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 1996, respondent’s motion for an extension of time is denied. A Rule having been entered by this Court on September 26, 1996, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Sandra Couch Collins to show cause why she should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Sandra Couch Collins is placed on tern-[1384]*1384porary suspension and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

CAPPY and NIGRO, JJ., dissent and would grant respondent’s motion for an extension of time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 1996, respondent’s motion for an extension of time is denied. A Rule having been entered by this Court on September 26, 1996, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Sandra Couch Collins to show cause why she should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Sandra Couch Collins is placed on tern-[1384]*1384porary suspension and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

CAPPY and NIGRO, JJ., dissent and would grant respondent’s motion for an extension of time.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

685 A.2d 1383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-collins-pa-1996.