In re Collins

6 Dem. Sur. 286
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Dem. Sur. 286 (In re Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Collins, 6 Dem. Sur. 286 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Opinion

The Surrogate.

I must deny the motion for a new hearing herein. I am not entirely satisfied that, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, the respondent’s attorney might not, before trial, have discovered the evidence upon which he now relies. And, besides, he does not present the affidavits of the persons from whom he expects the additional testimony or show why he has failed so to do. This circumstance is of itself fatal to his application (Shumway v. Fowler, 4 [287]*287Johns., 425; Denn v. Morrell, 1 Hall, 382; Sheppard v. Sheppard, 5 Hals., 250; Smith v. Cushing, 18 Wisc., 295; Gould v. Moore, 40 N. Y. Sup’r., 387; Arnold v. Skaggs, 35 Cal., 684; Cowan v. Smith, 35 Ill., 416; Bright v. Wilson, 7 B. Mon., 122).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Mayer's Estate
32 N.Y.S. 851 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Dem. Sur. 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-collins-nysurct-1887.