In Re Colling's Guardianship

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

In Re Colling's Guardianship

1914 OK 177, 140 P. 141, 40 Okla. 629, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 110

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided April 7, 1914·No. 5838·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

RUSSELL, J.

An investigation of this record discloses that the plaintiff in error’s third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth assignments of error require an examination of the evi *630 dence introduced at the trial in the court below, and as the case-made does not contain any of the evidence itpon said matters in the court below the appeal is dismissed. Graham et al. v. Atwood, 41 Okla. --, 136 Pac. 1080, and authorities there cited; Waltham Piano Co. v. Wolcott, 38 Okla. 770, 135 Pac. 339, and authorities there cited.

All the justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RUSSELL, J.

An investigation of this record discloses that the plaintiff in error’s third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth assignments of error require an examination of the evi *630 dence introduced at the trial in the court below, and as the case-made does not contain any of the evidence itpon said matters in the court below the appeal is dismissed. Graham et al. v. Atwood, 41 Okla. --, 136 Pac. 1080, and authorities there cited; Waltham Piano Co. v. Wolcott, 38 Okla. 770, 135 Pac. 339, and authorities there cited.

All the justices concur.

In Re Colling's Guardianship, 1914 OK 177, 140 P. 141, 40 Okla. 629, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 110 (Okla. 1914).

Pincite

1914 OK 177 (In Re Colling's Guardianship) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related