In re Collarn
19 A. 755, 134 Pa. 551, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 744
Opinion
Opinion,
The petitioner’s own statement of his case puts him out of court. A remonstrance was filed against his application, upon the ground that he was not a man of good moral character. A hearing was had upon the issue thus' raised, and, as there is nothing to show that it was not conducted in a legal manner, [554]*554there is an end of the case. We cannot review such cases upon the merits. All we can do is to see that the license court has proceeded according to law. Prospect Brewing Co.’s Petition, 127 Pa. 523, has no application.
Writ refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Collarn, 19 A. 755, 134 Pa. 551, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 744 (Pa. 1890).
19 A. 755 (In re Collarn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore's License
58 Pa. Super. 225 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Donoghue's License
5 Pa. Super. 1 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)
Commonwealth v. George W. Kerns & Bro.
2 Pa. Super. 59 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
Johnson's License
31 A. 203 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1894)
Branch & Power's License
30 A. 296 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1894)