In re Coley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Coley

784 A.2d 72, 170 N.J. 73, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1510

DecidedNovember 16, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 784 A.2d 72 (In re Coley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Coley, 784 A.2d 72, 170 N.J. 73, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1510 (N.J. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-216, concluding that JAMES R. COLEY, JR., of TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.5(a) (practicing law while ineligible), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disci[74]*74plinary authorities) and RPC 8.4(a) (violation of Rules of Professional Conduct), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES R. COLEY, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-216, concluding that JAMES R. COLEY, JR., of TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.5(a) (practicing law while ineligible), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disci[74]*74plinary authorities) and RPC 8.4(a) (violation of Rules of Professional Conduct), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES R. COLEY, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

784 A.2d 72, 170 N.J. 73, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-coley-nj-2001.