In re Coleman

472 S.E.2d 841, 266 Ga. 652, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1594, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 218
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 6, 1996·No. S96Y1038·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

Lourdes Neely Coleman filed a petition for voluntary discipline instead of an answer under Bar Rule 4-212 (d). The State Bar opposed the original petition on the ground that it did not contain sufficient admissions of fact and conduct to authorize the imposition of discipline as required under Bar Rule 4-212 (d). The State Bar did not object to the Respondent’s amended petition and the special master and the review panel recommended that the Respondent be suspended for six months for her conduct violating Standards 44 and 68 of Bar Rule 4-102, with full credit for the six months she was previously suspended under Bar Rule 4-204.3. This Court entered an order suspending the Respondent on May 3, 1995, and an order of reinstatement on November 8, 1995. We agree with the review panel’s recommendation. Accordingly, Lourdes Neely Coleman is suspended from the practice of law in Georgia for six months, with full credit given for the six months she was suspended under Bar Rule 4-204.3 (d).

Suspended.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Coleman, 472 S.E.2d 841, 266 Ga. 652, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1594, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 218 (Ga. 1996).

472 S.E.2d 841 (In re Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Zoota
532 S.E.2d 107 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2000)