In re Colbert

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Colbert

132 So. 3d 1261, 2014 WL 503177, 2014 La. LEXIS 269

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 7, 2014

DocketNo. 2013-B-2928

StatusPublished

This text of 132 So. 3d 1261 (In re Colbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Colbert, 132 So. 3d 1261, 2014 WL 503177, 2014 La. LEXIS 269 (La. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent notarized a document outside the presence of the sig[1262]*1262natory. Prior to the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which the parties stipulated that respondent engaged in the alleged misconduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Royal L. Colbert, Louisiana Bar Roll number 27412, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent notarized a document outside the presence of the sig[1262]*1262natory. Prior to the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which the parties stipulated that respondent engaged in the alleged misconduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Royal L. Colbert, Louisiana Bar Roll number 27412, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 So. 3d 1261, 2014 WL 503177, 2014 La. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-colbert-la-2014.