In re Colao

10 F. Supp. 406, 1934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1115
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The only grounda for withholding a discharge from a bankrupt are those set forth in section 14 of the Act, as amended, 11 USCA § 32. The creditor’s specifications here do not come under any of the seven enumerated grounds. They allege simply that the creditor holds a claim for willful and malicious injury to property. It is not a ground for opposing the bankrupt’s discharge that he may owe a nondischargeable debt. Such a debt will not be affected [407] by his discharge, but it does not defeat his right to be discharged. The specifications will therefore be dismissed as insufficient on their face and an order discharging the bankrupt will be entered. The question whether the creditor’s claim is barred by discharge in bankruptcy is a matter to he determined by the state court in later proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Colao, 10 F. Supp. 406, 1934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1115 (S.D.N.Y. 1934).

10 F. Supp. 406 (In re Colao) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Biscoe
45 F. Supp. 422 (D. Massachusetts, 1942)
Francine v. Babayan
45 F. Supp. 321 (E.D. New York, 1942)
Ex parte Colao
10 F. Supp. 608 (S.D. New York, 1934)