In re Cohen
109 A.D.2d 975, 486 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47478
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Cohen. Read the opinion of the Court — 107 A.D.2d 189 →
Opinion
— It appearing that respondent has provided satisfactory proof of his daily personal attendance at and completion of a formal Bar review course as required by our prior decision (Matter of Cohen, 105 AD2d 1009), application granted and petitioner reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Cohen, 109 A.D.2d 975, 486 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47478 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
109 A.D.2d 975 (In re Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Cohen
105 A.D.2d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)