In re Cohen

265 A.D. 339, 39 N.Y.S.2d 27, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5751
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Cohen. Read the opinion of the Court — 265 A.D. 1029

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Notwithstanding the settlement by part payment of his obligation under an indemnity agreement given by him, the conduct of the respondent should not be condoned. This is particularly true in view of his pleading a false defense, that the sum of twenty-five dollars paid by him on account of his obligation under the indemnity agreement, was in full settlement and discharge theréof.

The respondent should be suspended for six months with leave to apply for reinstatement at the expiration of that term upon proof of his compliance with the conditions incorporated in the order.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent suspended for six months.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Cohen, 265 A.D. 339, 39 N.Y.S.2d 27, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5751 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

265 A.D. 339 (In re Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.