In re Cogan

Second Circuit

In re Cogan

228 F. 192, 142 C.C.A. 548, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2008

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided October 12, 1915·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

When a party considers himself aggrieved by the action of a District Court or of a District Judge in granting or refusing an injunction, he may review such action by appeal. See section 129, Judicial Code (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1134 [Comp. St. 1913, § 1121]). Certiorari to review will not lie.

This certainly is not an appeal; indeed, the papers fail to indicate that suit in equity was ever brought. Apparently no process was ever served, and no bill of complaint was ever filed.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

When a party considers himself aggrieved by the action of a District Court or of a District Judge in granting or refusing an injunction, he may review such action by appeal. See section 129, Judicial Code (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1134 [Comp. St. 1913, § 1121]). Certiorari to review will not lie.

This certainly is not an appeal; indeed, the papers fail to indicate that suit in equity was ever brought. Apparently no process was ever served, and no bill of complaint was ever filed.

Motion denied.

In re Cogan, 228 F. 192, 142 C.C.A. 548, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2008 (2d Cir. 1915).

Pincite

228 F. 192 (In re Cogan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.