In re Cockley

538 S.E.2d 4, 342 S.C. 437, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 199
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided September 22, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

On January 26, 1998, petitioner was suspended from the practice of law for eighteen (18) months retroactive to May 2, 1996. In the Matter of Cockley, 329 S.C. 369, 495 S.E.2d 780 (1998). Petitioner has now filed a petition for reinstatement. The Committee on Character and Fitness recommends that the petition be granted. We agree and hereby reinstate petitioner to the practice of law in this state.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

/s/ James E. Moore, J.

/s/ John H. Waller, Jr., J.

/s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J.

/s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Cockley, 538 S.E.2d 4, 342 S.C. 437, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 199 (S.C. 2000).

538 S.E.2d 4 (In re Cockley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Evans
669 S.E.2d 85 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2008)