In re Cockley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Cockley

538 S.E.2d 4, 342 S.C. 437, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 199

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedSeptember 22, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 538 S.E.2d 4 (In re Cockley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cockley, 538 S.E.2d 4, 342 S.C. 437, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 199 (S.C. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On January 26, 1998, petitioner was suspended from the practice of law for eighteen (18) months retroactive to May 2, 1996. In the Matter of Cockley, 329 S.C. 369, 495 S.E.2d 780 (1998). Petitioner has now filed a petition for reinstatement. The Committee on Character and Fitness recommends that the petition be granted. We agree and hereby reinstate petitioner to the practice of law in this state.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

/s/ James E. Moore, J.

/s/ John H. Waller, Jr., J.

/s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J.

/s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI