In Re Cochran
This text of In Re Cochran (In Re Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE GARY D. COCHRAN, RUDOLPH BERGSMA and ROSEMARY BERGSMA. ____________________
2011-1225 (Serial No. 11/052, 155) ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
GEORGE L. BOLLER, of Livonia, Michigan, argued for appellants.
FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia argued for appellee. With her on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor and SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Associate Solicitor. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 13, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Cochran, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cochran-cafc-2011.