in Re: Cnh Capital America
This text of in Re: Cnh Capital America (in Re: Cnh Capital America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN RE: CNH CAPITAL AMERICA, LLC
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam (1)
Relator, CNH Capital America, LLC, filed a petition for writ of mandamus by which it requests that this Court direct respondent, the Honorable Arnoldo Cantu, Jr., presiding judge of County Court at Law No. 5 of Hidalgo County, Texas, to vacate his July 16, 2009 order denying relator's plea to the jurisdiction in trial court cause number CI-09-1097-E.
This Court, having examined and fully considered relator's petition, is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought and the petition should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 18th day of August, 2009.
1. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions), 52.8(d) ("When
denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.").
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Cnh Capital America, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cnh-capital-america-texapp-2009.